The Influence of Brand Satisfaction on Brand Loyalty with Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Love as Intervening Variables on Millennial Consumer at Clinic Ms Glow Medan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56444/icbeuntagsmg.v2i1.1755Keywords:
Brand satisfaction, brand loyalty, emotional brand attachment, brand loveAbstract
This research aims to test the influence of Brand Satisfaction on Brands Loyalty with Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Love as Intervening Variables. In this study, the population was Millennial Consumers at Clinic Ms Glow Medan. Sample used in this research were 150 respondents, sampling technique using purposive sampling. Data collection uses questionnaires and answers assessed using a Likert scale. Data analysis uses SmartPLS with analysis methods SEM (Structural Equation Modeling). The results of this research show that brand satisfaction, emotional brand attachment, and brand love have a positive and significant effect on brand loyalty. Brand satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on emotional brand attachment. Brand satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on brand love. Emotional brands attachment has a positive and significant effect on brand love. Brand satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on brand loyalty on Millennial Consumers at Clinic Ms Glow Medan mediated by emotional brand attachment. Brand satisfaction has a positive effect and significant impact on brand loyalty on Millennial Consumer at Clinic Ms Glow Medan which is mediated by brand love, in this case it is in the form of complementary mediation.
References
Arbaa, O., & Varon, E. (2018). The Role of Active Management and Asset Allocation Policy on Government and Corporate Bond Fund Returns. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2018.04.002
Cárcaba, A., Arrondo, R., & González, E. (2022). Does good local governance improve subjective well-being? European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100192
Colombarolli, C., & Lersch, P. M. (2023). Atypical Work, Financial Assets, and Asset Poverty in Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 85(December 2022), 100803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100803
Egan, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2023). Accounting for corporate environmental rebounds. A conceptual approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419(December 2022), 138175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138175
Ferry, L., Funnell, W., & Oldroyd, D. (2023). A genealogical and archaeological examination of the development of corporate governance and disciplinary power in English local government c.1970–2010. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 109, 101466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101466
Handoyo, S. (2023). Worldwide governance indicators: Cross country data set 2012–2022. Data in Brief, 51, 109814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109814
Hari Ginardi, R. V., Gunawan, W., & Wardana, S. R. (2017). WebGIS for Asset Management of Land and Building of Madiun City Government. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.175
Iversen, E. K., Grimsrud, K., Lindhjem, H., & Navrud, S. (2024). Mountains of trouble: Accounting for environmental costs of land use change from tourism development. Tourism Management, 102(November 2023), 104870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104870
Kassa, E. T., & Ning, J. (2023). A Systematic Review on The Roles of Knowledge Management in Public Sectors: Synthesis and Way Forwards. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22293
Korabayev, B., Amanova, G., Akimova, B., Saduakassova, K., & Nurgaliyeva, A. (2023). The model of environmental accounting and auditing as a factor in increasing the efficiency of management decisions at industrial enterprises in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 16(3), 12727. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12727
Mahaarcha, D., & Sirisunhirun, S. (2023). Social capital and farmers’ participation in multi-level irrigation governance in Thailand. Heliyon, 9(8), e18793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18793
Maqdliyan, R., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Antecedents and Consequences of Public Sector Organizational Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100042
Nasution, D. A. D. (2020). Effect of budgetary participation on the budgetary slack with information asymmetry, environmental uncertainty, and budget emphasis as variables moderation. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 4(2), 113-120.
Nasution, D. A. D., Muda, I., Sumekar, A., & Abubakar, E. (2021, March). Analysis of The Economic Behavior of Society E-Commerce as An Impact on The Development of The 4.0 Industrial Revolution and Society 5.0. In BICED 2020: Proceedings of the 2nd EAI Bukittinggi International Conference on Education, BICED 2020, 14 September, 2020, Bukititinggi, West Sumatera, Indonesia (Vol. 217). European Alliance for Innovation.
Rahman, M. M., Saha, S., & Hoque, M. (2024). Unveiling the link between environmental management accounting, energy efficiency, and accountability in state-owned enterprises: An integrated analysis using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Environmental Challenges, 14(November 2023), 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100832
Selten, F., & Klievink, B. (2024). Organizing Public Sector AI Adoption: Navigating Between Separation and Integration. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101885
Vilarinho, H., D’Inverno, G., Nóvoa, H., & Camanho, A. S. (2023). Performance Analytics for Regulation in Retail Water Utilities: Guiding Asset Management by Identifying Peers and Targets. Utilities Policy, 82(January), 101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101559
Wang, J., Xing, Q., Tong, Y., Wang, Z., & Li, B. (2023). Establish governance systems for securing black soils in China based on a new law. Soil Security, 13(May), 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100112
Zhang, J., & Mora, L. (2023). Nothing but symbolic: Chinese new authoritarianism, smart government, and the challenge of multi-level governance. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101880