Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pencurian dengan Pemberatan
(Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1382/Pid.B/2023/PN Mdn)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56444/mia.v20i2.1185Keywords:
Criminal Liability, Aggravated Theft, District CourtAbstract
The aim of this research is to find out how criminal responsibility is for perpetrators of theft with weights in the Legal Area of the Medan District Court. The research method used is a normative legal method with a type of normative juridical research, where research focuses on studying the application of rules or norms in positive law. The results of this research show that the criminal and his partner were legally proven and promised to be guilty of committing the crime of "aggravated theft", the factor that caused the perpetrator to commit the crime of theft was because the criminal was addicted to drugs. The judge's decision stated that the fraudster did not find anything that could eliminate criminal liability for himself. Criminal liability for the defendant is imprisonment for: 10 (ten) months in prison minus the period of isolation that has been served and with an order that the defendant remain in detention.
References
Book / Buku:
Adami Chazawi. 2002. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta
Andi Hamzah. 2008. Hukum Acara Pidana Indoneisa. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Bambang purnomo.1985. Asas-asas hukum pidana. Ghalia Indonesia
Barda Nawawi ARIEF. 2002. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung
Chairul Huda.2006. Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, PT Kencana. Jakarta
Jurnal
Bahtiar, B., Natsir, M., & Balla, H. (2023). Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 10(1), 592–599.
Dewo Wapa Soembogo, E. W. (2019). TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN DIPUTUS BERDASARKAN PASAL 362 KUHP (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 13/PID.B/2019/PN.TJP). 1–15.
DM, M. Y., Jagat, S. S., Perdana, R., & Saragih, G. M. (2022). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penegak Hukum yang Memiliki Peran Penting dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 7250-7258.
Fauzi, M. Y., & Jainah, Z. O. (2022). ANALISIS PERTANGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERCOBAAN PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN (Studi Putusan Nomor: 122 /Pid.B/2021/PN.Kbu). Jurnal Suara Keadilan, 23(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.24176/sk.v23i1.8558
Lubis, N. F., Ablisar, M., Yunara, E., & Marlina, M. (2023). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Pencurian dengan Pemberatan (CURAT) dan Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan (CURAS). Jurnal Sosial dan Sains, 3(3), 271-285
Negeri, M. H. P. (2023). Putusan Nomor 1382/Pid.B/2023/PN Mdn.
Putra, A. H., & Waluyo, W. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pinjaman Online Berkeadilan dan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 11, 118–129. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/hpe/article/view/68284
