Efektivitas Kinerja Guru dan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Kekompakkan Penyelesaian Konflik Sosial di Sekolah

Authors

  • Lailal Amna UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Silfia Hanani UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56444/soshumdik.v2i4.1256

Keywords:

Rules, Enforcement, Moral Education

Abstract

Moral education is an effort to mature humans who have an identity as actual human. School order is often used as an indication of the success of mental development and student behavior. The reality is that in schools there are stillmany violations of regulations school order. This condition gives rise to various problems and problems regarding implementation of moral education. This research uses Max Weber's social action theory with qualitative research methods and Schutz's phenomenological approach. Selection technique research subjects used purposive techniques. Data collection techniques are carried out through observation, interviews and documentation. Data analysis techniques use data reduction techniques, presenting data and drawing conclusions. The results obtained are the practice of school rules as a means of moral education at SMKN 3 Payakumbuh using a points system per semester recorded in the disciplinary book. Sanctions are educational in nature, especially for instilling students moral education. Enforcement of school rules at SMKN 3 Payakumbuh uses steps – steps in the form of installation in strategic places, socialization of school rules and regulations, and daily control of students as well as the involvement of teachers and leadership elements in maintaining social balance in the school environment. The obstacles faced in enforcing school rules are: lack of consistency of teachers in enforcing school rules. Efforts to overcome violations of school rules, namely preventive, curative and repressive measures.

References

Akhtar, Shafqat Naeem, Muhammad Amir Hashmi and Syed Imtiaz Hussain Naqvi. 2009. A comparative study of job satisfaction in public and private school teachers at secondary level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 4222-4228.

Bambang Budi Wiyono, 2000. Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dan Semangat Kerja Guru dalam Melaksanakan Tugas Jabatan di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Filsafat, Teori dan Praktik Kependidikan. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Burhanuddin, Imron, Ali, Maisyaroh. 2002. Manajemen Pendidikan. Wacana, Proses dan Aplikasinya di Sekolah. Malang: Universits Negeri Malang

Choa, Jeewon, Fred Dansereau. 2010. Are transformational leaders fair? A multi-level study of transformational leadership, justice perceptions, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, Volume 21, Issue 3, June 2010, Pages 409-421

Cummings, G.G.. 2009. Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. (2009), doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.006 (In Press)

Daniel, Yvette. 2008. “Principal Leadership in New Teacher Induction: Becoming Agent of Change”. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, Vol 3 p. 3

Dinas Pendidikan Kota Bandung. 2010. Rencana Strategi Pendidikan Kota Bandung 2010, Bandung.

Kanisius Suban Keraf, Peran Pemerintah Kota Pekanbaru Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Pada Sekolah Menengah Atas Swasta Tahun 2014, Jom Fisip Vol. 4 No. 1 Februari 2017, Hal. 2

Karslıa, Mehmet D. and Hale İskender, 2009. To examine the effect of the motivation provided by the administration on the job satisfaction of teachers and their institutional commitment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Volume 1, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 2252-2257. World Conference on Educational Sciences, Nicosia, North Cyprus, 4-7 February 2009 - New Trends and Issues in Educational Sciences

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional RI. 2010. Rencana Strategi Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional Tahun 2010-2014, Jakarta

Kian-Ping Wee, et al.. 2006. Organizational Leadership and Its Relative Influences. Journal of Information & Optimization Sciences, vol 27/2006 No.1, 241-248.

Kreitner, Robert & Kinicki, Angelo.2003. Organizational Behavior: Key Concepts, Skilsl and Best Practices. 5 th Edition. McGraw-Hill International Edition. Management Series. New York.

Nina Lamatenggo, 2011. Studi Korelasional antara Penilaian Guru tentang Perilaku Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dan Motivasi Kerja dengan Kinerja Guru. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya, Analisis Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara

Noor Alan Deby Kusuma, Praktek Tata Tertib Sekolah Sebagai Sarana Pendidikan Moral Di Sman 1 Kamal, Paradigma. Volume 02 Nomer 01 Tahun 2014, Hal. 1-2

Soekarso, Agus Sosro, Iskandar Putong, dan Cecep Hidayat, 2010. Teori Kepemimpinan. Jakarta:Mitra Wacana Media.

Tse, Herman H.M., Marie T. Dasboroughb, Neal M. Ashkanasya (2010) A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. The Leadership Quarterly Volume 19, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages 195-211.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

Lailal Amna, & Silfia Hanani. (2023). Efektivitas Kinerja Guru dan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Kekompakkan Penyelesaian Konflik Sosial di Sekolah. Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 2(4), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.56444/soshumdik.v2i4.1256