Formulasi Diskresi Pada Penyelenggaraan Reformasi Birokrasi Di Kanwil Kementerian Agama Provinsi Jawa Tengah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56444/mia.v20i2.1128Keywords:
bureaucratic reform, good governance, discretion, accountability, policyAbstract
State administration is never separated from policy making. Bureaucratic reforms is carried out to realize good governance, therefore policy is a must because all the implementation of programs and community services should be conducted. One of the policies that is often carried out is discretion, with the aim of filling the regulatory vacuum and not stopping innovating in carrying out policies because of the regulatory vacuum. This study was conducted to analyze the formulation of discretion in the implementation of bureaucratic reform. This research was conducted with a qualitative approach. Results of the study: 1) discretion is carried out by taking into account the objectives, causes and conditions for using discretion; 2) discretion that is contrary to the objectives, procedures and conditions can be canceled; 3) it is necessary to build an accountability system in the implementation of discretion so that it does not lead to corrupt behavior. Conclusion: discretion is an innovation that can be accounted for by the government and society
References
A.M. Donner. (1987). Nederlands Bestuursrecht (Algemeen Deel), Samson H.D. Tjeenk Willink, Alphen aan den Rijn.
Asmara, G. (2022). Urgensi Kewenangan Diskresi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Untuk Memajukan Kesejahteraan Umum. Jurnal Diskresi, 1(1), 1–16.
Bayu Dwi Anggono, N. Y. M. (2021). Konsistensi Bentuk Dan Materi Muatan Surat Edaran Sebagai Produk Hukum Dalam Penanganan Covid-19. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(4), 351–362.
Darumurti, K. . (2012). Kekuasaan Diskresi Pemerintah. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Dye, T. R. (2005). Understanding Public Policy, Eleventh Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.
Keban, Y. (2008). Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik: Konsep, Teori dan Isu. Gava Media.
Murtir Jeddawi. (2017). DISKRESI (FREIES ERMESSEN) : PERANGKAT HUKUM PENUNJANG PEMBANGUNAN. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Suara Khatulistiwa, II(2), 1–11. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-bekasi/baca-artikel/13112/Fleksibilitas-Tempat-Kerja-Normal-Baru-Birokrasi.html
No Title. (2020). Majalah Konstitusi No. 159, 68–69.
Rahmat Saputra, Zaenal Muttaqin, Hernadi Affandi, A. E. R. (2023). Discretion as a Government Policy Innovation in Indonesia. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self Government, 21(2).
Sidney. (2007). Perumusan Kebijakan Publik. Diterjemahkan oleh Amidjaya. BNSP.
Sirajudin, E. a. (2012). Hukum Pelayanan Publik: Berbasis Partisipasi dan Keterbukaan Informasi. Setara Press.
Solichin. (2014). Analisis Kebijakan: dari Formulasi Ke Penyusunan Model-Model Implementasi Kebijakan Publik. Bumi Aksara.
Sunarno. (2006). Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Good Governance di Indonesia. Governance. Yusaintanas Prima. Jakarta, 10(2), 7–16. http://jwk.bandung.lan.go.id/ojs/index.php/jwk/article/view/404
Thoha, M. (2008). Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Utomo, W. (2007). Administrasi Publik Baru, Program MAP UGM. Pustaka Pelajar.
