Penegakan Hukum Dalam Mengadili Anggota Militer Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Umum

Authors

  • Arief Fahmi Lubis Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer – PTHM/AHM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56444/jma.v6i1.1130

Keywords:

Military Justice, TNI Soldiers, KUHPM, Law Enforcement

Abstract

The penalties imposed on TNI soldiers are actually more severe than those imposed in general courts. The punishment imposed on TNI soldiers is not only limited to imprisonment or fines, but sometimes serious criminal offenders are often given additional punishment in the form of dishonorable discharge (PDTH) from military service. The aim of this research is to show that for legal subjects who have military status, the role of superiors who have the right to punish or what is known as Ankum is very dominant. Military members who are involved in criminal acts are subject to two inherent penalties, namely first, in the form of disciplinary penalties which are imposed in the form of penalties for delaying promotion, demotion or even dismissal. This research is qualitative which uses a descriptive approach to collect data systematically, factually and quickly according to the description when the research was carried out. The results of this research show that the determination of absolute competence based on the emphasis on the consequences of losses incurred can be said to be in line with what is stated in Article 3 paragraph (4) letter a of TAP MRP Number VII of 2000 concerning the Role of the Indonesian National Army and the Role of the Republic of Indonesia's National Police. Indonesia which states that "Indonesian National Army soldiers are subject to the authority of the general judiciary in matters of general criminal offences." Strengthened by Article 65 paragraph (2) of the TNI Law which states "Soldiers are subject to the authority of military justice in cases of violations of military criminal law and are subject to the power of general justice in cases of violations of general criminal law as regulated by law."

References

Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang KUHAP.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Sri Hartati dan H. Hudali Mukti, “Peranan Ankum dalam Proses Pemberhentian Prajurit TNI AD secara Administrasi (Studi di Hukum Kodam VI/Mlw)”, Jurnal Yuriska, Vol.7 No.1, 2015.

Eva Achjani Zulfa, Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan, (Bandung : Lubak Agung, 2011).

Sugiri, dkk., 30 Tahun Perkembangan Peradilan Militer Di Indonesia, (Jakarta : Babinkum, 1976).

Sumartono, Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan, (Yogyakarta : Kanisius, 2007).

Amanda Rosaline, “Kewenangan Peradilan Militer Dalam Mengadili Purnawirawan TNI”, Jurist-Diction, Vol.1, No.1, Agustus 2018.

Ardyanto Imam W, dkk., “Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Terhadap TIndak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika yang Dilakukan oleh Anggota TNI”, Jurnal Srambi Hukum, Vol. 08 No. 02 Agustus 2014.

R. Abdlluah, Hukum Acara Peradilan Militer di Indonesia, (Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 1981).

FM. Wantu, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Teori dan Praktik, (Yogyakarta: Reviva Cendekia, 2011).

Downloads

Published

2021-04-26

How to Cite

Arief Fahmi Lubis. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Mengadili Anggota Militer Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Umum. Jurnal Media Administrasi, 6(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.56444/jma.v6i1.1130